Skip to content
FDE BI Evidence Workbenchobserved → compared → decided → scoped
Engagement board Current gold promoted Model codex Packet xlsx-evidence-v2 Identifiers and receipts

TargetArchitecture_Partial.xlsx

8 sheets · compared 2026-07-30T13:19:23.086Z

  1. Source input Original workbook bytes · 8 sheets Source input detail
  2. XLSX.evidence 12 categories accounted for XLSX.evidence detail
  3. Current gold promoted build Current gold detail
  4. Model walk codex Model walk detail
  5. Your decisions 0 of 13 answered Your decisions detail
  6. Scope / SOW Blocked until every finding is answered Scope / SOW detail

The model says

14 findings

10 direct 1 context 3 not found

You say

0 of 13 answered

The gap is the outstanding work. Context-only findings are excluded — they describe the estate rather than propose it.

Fiscal Calendar

34 × 3 · 31 formulas · 1 findings cite this sheet

Needs your call 1

Each becomes a final, immutable disposition.

Review all 1
Calendar.FiscalMonth column Direct match · Target Fields!A7:J7 · Fiscal Calendar!A2:C3 +1 Decide

How the model read it

Current gold observes the exact Int64 Calendar.FiscalMonth column. Workbook context indicates a July fiscal-year start and supplies a formula for month numbering. Gold does not establish that the current model uses that exact derivation and notes that the column is summarised by Sum.

Does the current Calendar.FiscalMonth use the required July-start numbering shown by the workbook formula?

Should Calendar.FiscalMonth be changed from Summarise by Sum to Summarise by None?

This project defines the next engagement. It does not assert that the target has been implemented.