Skip to content
FDE BI Evidence Workbenchobserved → compared → decided → scoped
Client deliverables Current gold wiki_7c268dbf7f8 11 pages Author codex · xhigh reasoning Bundle ed3960889802 See the exact bundle

Generate the engagement reports

Both documents are written across the whole engagement from one evidence bundle, so they cannot disagree on a number. The narrative is model-authored; the figures come from the bundle, and each document carries a provenance footer this application writes itself.

The rule these documents run on

Where you have not answered, the model's finding is carried through

A scope document on the board stays blocked until every finding has your answer. That is right for an internal receipt and useless for a document that has to be written now. So here, your decision governs where you made one, and where you did not the model's reading stands as the working position. Every item carried that way is counted, and the weak ones are named, so the reader can always tell an agreed item from an assumed one.

Answer more findings on the board first

Basis of the 45 items

4 of 7 inputs assessed

Carrying your explicit decision
1
Assumed from the model's finding
44
…of those, resting on a possible or ambiguous match
2
Context-only observations, excluded from both counts
1

Data Readiness Report

For Chief Financial Officer and finance leadership

What the client asked us for: how ready their spreadsheet-declared reporting requirements are against the Power BI estate we could actually see.

  • 4 inputs across 24 sheets, in broad categories
  • How much of the declared requirement is already there
  • Written for a numerate reader who is not technical

The evidence has changed since this was written

Findings or decisions have moved. The document below is still readable and still traceable to the bundle it used, but it is behind the board.

Written 2026-07-31T05:01:12.793Z · codex · 0 decided / 45 assumed

Preview .md .docx

Phase Two Scope / Statement of Work

For Client sponsor, delivery lead and commercial approver

What the follow-on engagement would do: the gaps being filled, what they rest on, and what the client has to supply.

  • 21 items become proposed work under the rule above
  • Appendix separates client spreadsheets from what we added
  • Assumption register names what could still move

The evidence has changed since this was written

Findings or decisions have moved. The document below is still readable and still traceable to the bundle it used, but it is behind the board.

Written 2026-07-31T05:03:22.518Z · codex · 0 decided / 45 assumed

Preview .md .docx

What goes in

The whole engagement, as the model will receive it.

Exact bundle
3
Client spreadsheets
1
Consultant requirements
24
Sheets
45
Items assessed
79
Open questions
3
Received, not assessed
Input Origin Sheets Readiness Model findings Your answers
TargetArchitecture_Partial.xlsx Client-supplied 8 Largely ready
14
0 / 13
TargetArchitecture_Match.xlsx Client-supplied 8 Ready
14
1 / 14
TargetArchitecture_CompleteMiss.xlsx Client-supplied 7 Material gaps
8
0 / 8
Month-end close adjustment controls Consultant-authored 1 Material gaps
10
0 / 10

Received, not assessed (3)

Held apart from the figures above so neither report can describe them as though they had been looked at. Both documents name them and claim nothing about them.

  • TargetArchitecture_Partial.xlsx 5 sheets · Ingested and inspected, but never compared with current gold. Nothing is claimed about it either way.
  • TargetArchitecture_Match.xlsx 5 sheets · Ingested and inspected, but never compared with current gold. Nothing is claimed about it either way.
  • TargetArchitecture_CompleteMiss.xlsx 6 sheets · Ingested and inspected, but never compared with current gold. Nothing is claimed about it either way.

Added by the consultant, not by the client

These carry our authority rather than the client's, so the SOW appendix lists them apart.

  • Month-end close adjustment controls Authored requirement · Synthetic Consultant
  • Synthetic journal control attributes Evidence added to gold · Synthetic Consultant

Earlier versions