Engagement board Current gold promoted Model codex Packet xlsx-evidence-v2 Identifiers and receipts

TargetArchitecture_Partial.xlsx

8 sheets · compared 2026-07-30T13:19:23.086Z

The model says

14 findings

10 direct 1 context 3 not found

You say

0 of 13 answered

The gap is the outstanding work. Context-only findings are excluded — they describe the estate rather than propose it.

Validation

3 × 3 · 2 formulas · 0 findings cite this sheet

Visual aid Exact model input Clear filter

No findings cite Validation.

Your desk

This input

13 findings need your call

Start reviewing

Scope readiness

Blocked

What is blocking it

Open questions19

Raised by the model — usually for the client.

Are Actual Expenses, Budget Revenue and Budget Expenses required as production measures even though they are absent from the authoritative register?
What are the approved DAX definitions and source for budget values?
Should revenue/expense classification use account-number ranges as in the prototype formulas, or governed AccountType/AccountGroup mappings?

All 19 questions

Boundary10

What this comparison could not see. Absence here is not proof of absence in the estate.

The workbook identifies its working records as synthetic and fictional (`Read Me!B8,B10`); they illustrate design intent but do not prove...
The evidence rendering deliberately excludes ordinary numeric, date and Boolean cell values. Consequently, sample key values, dates, amounts,...

All 10 limitations

This project defines the next engagement. It does not assert that the target has been implemented.