Preserve JournalSource and ApprovalStatus at ledger-entry grain

Finding and your answer

Preserve JournalSource and ApprovalStatus at ledger-entry grain

Possible match 87%

How the model read it

Consultant evidence describes both upstream attributes as ledger-entry-grain fields and recommends preserving that grain. The audited model does not contain the attributes, and current gold does not establish a unique ledger-entry key or confirm the implemented Ledger table grain, so feasibility is supported but conformity is unverified.

Workbook evidence

Consultant Requirement!A5

Cited current gold

fde-finance.current-model fde-finance.journal-controls

Open questions

What column or composite key uniquely identifies a ledger entry?

Can one ledger entry have multiple approval history rows?

Will ingestion deduplicate, aggregate, or otherwise change source grain?

Your answer Confirmed match Current estate already satisfies this. Confirmed partial Partly satisfied — the remainder becomes phase-two work. Confirmed gap Not satisfied — becomes phase-two work. Excluded from scope Stays visible for traceability, but is not proposed work. Needs more evidence Blocks scope until resolved. Enters the research queue.

Why Decided by

Confirmed partial and gap answers enter the scope queue. “Needs more evidence” enters the research queue and blocks the scope document until it is resolved.