The current-gold boundary contains only the selected finance current-state page and a journal-controls evidence page. Absence from these pages is not proof of enterprise-wide absence.

The workbook states that all sample values are fictional and intended for design discussion, not reconciliation or production reporting (`Read Me`!B10). Ordinary numeric values were deliberately excluded from the evidence rendering, so prototype inputs and calculated outputs cannot be inspected or reconciled.

Formula text was extracted, but stored formulas do not prove successful recalculation, current cached values or production correctness.

No workbook connections, queries, external links, Power Query/DataMashup, pivots, charts, slicers or embedded Power Pivot model were found. Therefore, the workbook evidences requirements and prototypes, not implemented data integration or a semantic model.

No comments, notes, hyperlinks, validation rules or conditional-formatting rules were found. The reference lists therefore do not demonstrate enforced data validation.

The workbook extraction was included without reported truncation or omitted items, but opaque binary payloads are indicator-only by profile and ordinary non-text data values are outside scope.

Exact DAX definitions for the four current-gold finance measures were not available, so their detailed semantics cannot be independently compared. Their observed names and the model structure nevertheless provide no supporting object for either requested sales measure.

The authoritative register does not explicitly declare `SalesOrder.CustomerIdentifier` or a relationship, although the synthetic order sheet implies that linkage. This is a requirements completeness issue rather than current implementation evidence.