Boundary
What this comparison could not see
Absence from the material below is not proof of absence in the estate.
-
The source is a six-text-cell virtual workbook; numeric values, formulas, formatting, and non-text workbook content were intentionally excluded.
-
All substantive requirements are contained in a single text cell, Consultant Requirement!A5; decomposition into ten requirements is interpretive but preserves exact source citation.
-
Current gold is bounded to two allowed pages in the selected build. Not-found results do not prove absence elsewhere in the client estate.
-
The audited semantic-model page did not provide exact DAX for observed measures, so no existing measure can be semantically repurposed by assumption.
-
The consultant evidence page supports upstream attribute availability but explicitly does not establish Power BI implementation.
-
No report-page inventory, visual metadata, refresh configuration, row-level source samples, ledger-entry key, or acceptance-test artefacts were available.
-
No substantive consultant-guidance comments were supplied beyond the trusted steering wrapper, so there was no additional guidance to apply.