Skip to content
FDE BI Evidence Workbenchobserved → compared → decided → scoped

Boundary

What this comparison could not see

Absence from the material below is not proof of absence in the estate.

  • The source is a six-text-cell virtual workbook; numeric values, formulas, formatting, and non-text workbook content were intentionally excluded.

  • All substantive requirements are contained in a single text cell, Consultant Requirement!A5; decomposition into ten requirements is interpretive but preserves exact source citation.

  • Current gold is bounded to two allowed pages in the selected build. Not-found results do not prove absence elsewhere in the client estate.

  • The audited semantic-model page did not provide exact DAX for observed measures, so no existing measure can be semantically repurposed by assumption.

  • The consultant evidence page supports upstream attribute availability but explicitly does not establish Power BI implementation.

  • No report-page inventory, visual metadata, refresh configuration, row-level source samples, ledger-entry key, or acceptance-test artefacts were available.

  • No substantive consultant-guidance comments were supplied beyond the trusted steering wrapper, so there was no additional guidance to apply.