Senior-authored Markdown
# Engagement state The selected evidence supports a bounded current-to-target discovery baseline. It does **not** establish that a target solution has been implemented. The connected Power BI Desktop model is an Import semantic model centred on `Ledger`, `Account` and `Calendar`, with a `Metrics` table and two hidden automatic date tables. `TargetArchitecture_Partial.xlsx` declares 13 required target columns across `Account`, `Calendar` and `Ledger`. ## Current-to-target position | Result | Count | Treatment | |---|---:|---| | Exact mappings | 10 | Consultant-confirmed `reuse_as_is` | | Partial mappings | 0 | No partial or transformed mapping is recorded | | Confirmed gaps | 3 | `acquire_or_source`; accepted for phase-two scope | The confirmed gaps are: - `Account.AccountGroup` - `Ledger.CostCentre` - `Ledger.CurrencyCode` ## Additional consultant evidence A consultant-supplied source, contributed by **Synthetic Consultant**, states that the governed finance ledger export contains entry-grain `Ledger.JournalSource` and `Ledger.ApprovalStatus` attributes. This is consultant evidence of upstream availability, not MCP observation and not evidence of Power BI implementation. Neither attribute is declared in the selected target workbook or covered by a mapping decision. ## Knowledge map - **Observed current semantic model** — tables, columns, measures, partitions and relationships returned by the Desktop audit. - **Declared target fields** — the 13 required columns in the workbook's `Target Fields` sheet. - **Current-to-target mapping coverage** — exact mappings, absence of partial mappings and confirmed gaps. - **Required enrichment gaps** — source and semantic design needed for the three target gaps. - **Consultant evidence: journal control attributes** — upstream availability and unresolved target status of `JournalSource` and `ApprovalStatus`. - **Recorded mapping and scope decisions** — what has been approved and what has not. - **Scope implications** — evidence-supported next-phase work. - **Evidence and access boundary** — what “not observed” means. - **Open discovery questions** — matters requiring client or consultant resolution. - **Evidence and authority method** — how claims and provenance are handled. ## Overall conclusion The declared target is substantially covered at field-structure level, but delivery is not a simple field-addition exercise. The three target enrichments need authoritative sources, keys, governance and acceptance tests. Currency semantics, calendar design and broader architecture requirements remain unresolved. The consultant-supplied journal controls require an explicit target and scope decision before they can be treated as delivery requirements.